Socio-Economic Research Bulletin 2023, 3-4 (86-87), 9-21

Open Access Article

The impact of transformation leadership on organizational creativity with job satisfaction as a mediating variable: a case study of FGV Holdings Berhad

Hadouga Hassiba
Doctor of Economics, Lecturer of Economics Department, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Abdelhamid Mehri Constantine 2 University, Algeria, e-mail: hadouga.hassiba@yahoo.fr, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-8608

Cite this article:

Hadouga, H. (2023). The impact of transformation leadership on organizational creativity with job satisfaction as a mediating variable: a case study of FGV Holdings Berhad [Vplyv transformatsiinoho liderstva na orhanizatsiinu kreatyvnist iz zadovolenistiu pratseiu yak poserednytskoiu zminnoiu: pryklad FGV Holdings Berhad], Socio-economic research bulletin, Vìsnik socìal’no-ekonomìčnih doslìdžen’ (ISSN 2313-4569), Odessa National Economic University, Odessa, No. 3-4 (86-87), pp. 9-21.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the impact of transformational leadership on organizational creativity with such a mediating variable as job satisfaction. The significance of the differences in the responses of FGV Hodings Berhad employees has been proven to the degree of practicing transformational leadership, practicing organizational creativity and job satisfaction that demonstrated by a sample consisting of one hundred permanent employees selected randomly by electronic response. This study uses a quantitative approach using a questionnaire, data testing method, Partial Least Squares (PLS) method which is part of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Sobel test for testing the mediation effect. Using a quantitative approach allows you to test a theory through research variables, using calculations and statistical analysis as indicators to determine whether there is an effect or qualitative relationship between variables when testing hypotheses. The independent variable in this study is transformational leadership (X) and the dependent variable is organizational creativity (Y), while the mediating variable is job satisfaction (Z). Based on the results of analysis and testing the hypotheses that were made in this study, we concluded that there is an acceptable level of practicing transformational leadership behavior in the studied organization, and this allows it to meet the modern requirements of external environment and gain competitive advantages through to its human resources, because it encourages all officials to take initiatives that contribute to the change process within the organization by acquiring transformational leadership behavior. It is proved that in the studied organization there is an acceptable level of measurement of organizational creativity, which allows achieving excellence in productivity for leadership ensuring. The results of the study at FGV Hodings Berhad showed a high level of transformational leadership behavior.

Keywords

transformational leadership; organizational creativity; job satisfaction.

JEL classification:M140; M200; DOI:https://doi.org/10.33987/vsed.3-4(86-87).2023.9-21

UD classification: 316.46:331.101.32

Лицензия Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

  1. Khalili, A. (2016). Linking transformational leadership, creativity, innovation, and innovation-supportive climate, Management Decision, Vol. 54, Issue 9, pp. 2277–2293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2016-0196.
  2. Gisbert-López, M. C., Verdú-Jover, A. J., & Gómez-Gras, J. M. (2014). The moderating effect of relationship conflict on the creative climate – innovation association: the case of traditional sectors in Spain, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 47–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.781525.
  3. Mustika, H., Eliyana, A., & Agustina, T. S. (2020). The effect of leadership behaviour on knowledge management practices at the PT Power Plant of East Java, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, Vol. 10, Issue 12, pp. 382–391.
  4. Mittal, S., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational leadership and employee creativity: Mediating role of creative self-efficacy and moderating role of knowledge sharing. Management Decision, Vol. 53, Issue 5, pp. 894–910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2014-0464.
  5. Boehnke, K., Bontis, N., DiStefano, J. J., & DiStefano, A. C. (2003). Transformational leadership: an examination of cross-national differences and similarities, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 24, Issue 1, pp. 5–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730310457285.
  6. Simola, S., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2012). Transformational leadership and leaders’ mode of care reasoning, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 108, pp. 229–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1080-x.
  7. Fitzgerald, S., & Schutte, N. S. (2010). Increasing transformational leadership through enhancing self‐efficacy, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 29, Issue 5, pp. 495–505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711011039240.
  8. Du, S., Swaen, V., Lindgreen, A., & Sen, S. (2013). The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 114, No. 1, pp. 155–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1333-3.
  9. Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 735–744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069307.
  10. Saiyaden, M. A. (1993). Human Resource Management, New Delhi, McGraw-Hil.
  11. Luthans, F. (1985). Organizational Behavior, McGill Illinois. 574 p.
  12. Bharadwaj, S., & Menon, A. (2000). Making innovation happen in organizations: individual creativity mechanisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both? Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 17, Issue 6, pp. 424–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1760424.
  13. Gioia, D. A. (1995). Contrasts and Convergences in Creativity: Themes in Academic and Practioner. Views In: Creative Action in Organizations: Ivory tower visions and real world voices. Ford, C. M., & Gioia, D. A. (Eds.), Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, p. 317.
  14. Jones, F. B. (1995). The changing face of creativity. In: Creative Action in Organizations: Ivory tower visions and real world voices. Ford, C. M., & Gioia, D. A. (Eds.), Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, p. 195.
  15. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2005). Transformational Leadership, 2ed, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 282 p.
  16. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., & Gaddis, B. H. (2003). How creative leaders think: Experimental findings and cases, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 14, Issues 4–5, pp. 411–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00045-6.
  17. Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 13, Issue 6, pp. 705–750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3.
  18. Riaz, A., & Haider, M. H. (2010). Role of transformational and transactional leadership on job satisfaction and career satisfaction, Business and Economic Horizons, Vol. 1, pp. 29–38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15208/beh.2010.05.
  19. Fonseca, A. M., Porto, J. B., & Barroso, A. C. (2012). O efeito de valores pessoais nas atitudes perante estilos de liderança, Revista de Administração Mackenzie, Vol. 13, No. 3, Edição Especial, pp. 122–149.
  20. Toda, F. A., Toda, R. A., Teixeira, A. F., & Junior, J. L. (2014). Um estudosobre a relação entre oestilo de liderança do professor e a satisfação do estudante, REUNA, Vol. 19, pp. 147–160.
  21. Batista, N. P. O., Kilimnik, Z. M., & Neto, M. T. R. (2016). Influência dos estilos de liderançanasatisfação no trabalho: um estudoemumaentidade de fins nãoeconômicos, Revista de Gestão e Tecnologia, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 24–39.
  22. Silva, M. B., Nascimento, E. M., & Cunha, V. A. (2017). Satisfação dos funcionários e estilos de liderança: existe relação? Revista Capital Científico – Eletrônica, Vol. 15, No. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-4153.20170030.
  23. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, Ch. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 40, Issue 3, pp. 414–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6.
  24. Farrell, W. M., Desch, M. D., Kaiser, M. L., Lecacheux, A., Kurth, W. S., Gurnett, D. A., Cecconi, B., & Zarka, P. (2005). A nightside source of Saturn’s kilometric radiation: Evidence for an inner magnetosphere energy driver, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 32, Issue 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023449.
  25. Negussie, N., Demissie, A. (2013). Relationship between leadership styles of nurese managers and nurses, job satisfaction in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 49–58. Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23559838.
  26. Iman, N., Lestari, W. (2019). The effect of leadership on job satisfaction, work motivation and performance of employees: Studies in AMIK Yapennas Kendari, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 13 (14), pp. 465–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2019.8794.
  27. Atmojo, M. (2012). The influence of transformational leadership on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and employee performance, International Research Journal of Business Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 113–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.5.2.113-128.
  28. Andreani, F., & Petrik, A. (2016). Employee performance as the impact of transformational leadership and job satisfaction in PT Anugerahbarudenpasar, Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, Vol. 18 (1), pp. 25–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.18.1.25-32.

Україна, м.Одеса, 65082
вул. Гоголя, 18, ауд. 110.
(048) 777-89-16
sbornik.odeu sbornik.vsed.oneu@gmail.com

Шановні автори!

Продовжується набір статей до першого випуску 2024 р. До публікації приймаються статті українською та англійською мовами.

З 2022 року діють нові вимоги до оформлення статей до збірника наукових праць "Вісник соціально-економічних досліджень"

3 01.11.2023 р. вартість публікації складає 80 грн. за 1 сторінку (див. розділ "Оплата").

Завантажити інформаційний буклет


Flag Counter