Theoretical contexts of strategic management of complex self-governing socio-economic systems

Zavgorodniy Konstantin
PhD in Economics, Researcher, Research Institute for the Development of Economy and Society, HEI «Alfred Nobel University», Dnipro, Ukraine, e-mail: v.a.tkachenko@duan.edu.ua, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7953-3971

Tkachenko Vladimir
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Research Institute for the Development of Economy and Society, HEI «Alfred Nobel University», Dnipro, Ukraine,, e-mail: v.a.tkachenko@duan.edu.ua, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4919-8658

Cite this article:

Zavgorodniy, K., Tkachenko, V. (2021). Theoretical contexts of strategic management of complex self-governing socio-economic systems [Teoretychni konteksty stratehichnoho upravlinnia skladnymy samokerovanymy sotsialno-ekonomichnymy systemamy], Socio-economic research bulletin, Vìsnik socìal’no-ekonomìčnih doslìdžen’ (ISSN 2313-4569), Odessa National Economic University, Odessa, No. 3-4 (78-79), pр. 19–28.

Abstract

The methodology contexts of perceiving complex self-governing socio-economic systems as planetary-civilizational social systems are theoretically substantiated in the article. Awareness of the essence of modern global and planetary crisis of civilization makes it possible to make sure that the planet Earth, which on the basis of classical approaches is traditionally perceived as a financial and economic one, should be considered methodologically as a planetary civilizational social system. Outstanding thinkers of our time, scientists from many highly developed countries have unequivocally proved that its main cause is the spiritual decline of society, the decline of the holistic consciousness of the subjects of society, orientation towards the definition of one-sided logical-mental intelligence, the loss of moral values and responsibility for the creation of man, the growing distrust to public administration institutions. All this emphasizes the inconsistency of a qualified and competent search the directions and mechanisms for overcoming the planetarycivilizational crisis of society. Therefore, the primary task of planetary civilization development is the need for a radical change in worldview, which would be based on life values: protecting people’s health, education, as the acquisition of new knowledge, peaceful coexistence, the dignity of man as such, trust and harmony in relations between people and people with nature. From a scientific point of view, this cardinal change in the worldview consists in the transition from target to value rationality based on the deepening of spiritual and moral factors that should set the vector of anti-crisis environmentally friendly thinking regarding all management decisions in the field of practical actions to reform national and global economic systems.

Keywords

strategic choice; self-governing complex systems; socio-economic dimension; creative initiative activity; intellectual potential; methodology of non-standard approaches.

JEL classification: A130; O150; R100; DOI: https://doi.org/10.33987/vsed.3-4(78-79).2021.19-28

UD classification: 33:65.01

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

1. Tkachenko, V. A. (2007). In search of a new paradigm of social development relations [V poshukakh novoi paradihmy vidnoshen suspilnoho rozvytku], Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, No. 1, s. 159–164 [in Ukrainian]
2. Zadorozhna, O. G. (2020). Methodological basics of the strategy development management of spiritual-noosphere stable anti-crisis development [Metodolohichni zasady upravlinnya rozrobkoiu stratehii dukhovno-noosfero-staloho hospodarskoho antykryzovoho rozvytku], Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, No. 1 (38), s. 176–182 [in Ukrainian]
3. Tkachenko, V. A. (2008). Intellectual potential as a means of rebuilding and renewal of unityof production forces and productive relations [Intelektualnyi potentsial yak zasib vidtvorennya ta ponovlennya yednosti vyrobnychykh syl i vyrobnychykh vidnosyn], Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu, No. 1 (11), s. 159–164 [in Ukrainian]
4. Lyashenko, V. I. (2006). Regulation of economic systems development: theory, regimes, institutions [Regulirovanie razvitiya ekonomicheskikh sistem: teoriya, rezhimy, instituty], DonNTU, Donetsk, 668 s. [in Russian]
5. Bulgakov, S. N. (1999). Economy philosophy [Filosofiya khozyaystva], Novye tekhnologii, Moskva, 367 s. [in Russian]
6. Horkheimer, M. (2011). The Eclipse of reason. Critique of instrumental reason. «Canon+» ROOI «Rehabilitation», Moskva, 224 p.
7. Tkachenko, V. A. (2014). Epistemological skepticism as a basis of economic policy in Ukraine: monograph [Epistemolohichnyi skeptytsyzm v osnovi ekonomichnoi polityky v Ukraini: monohrafiia], DUAN, Monolit, Dnipropetrovsk, 264 s. [in Ukrainian]
8. Kholod, S. B. (2015). Management of innovative development at mesolevel: monograph. Ed. by V. A. Tkachenko [Upravlinnia innovatsiinym rozvytkom na mezorivni: monohrafiia; za nauk. red. V. A. Tkachenka], DUAN, Monolit, Dnipropetrovsk, 360 s. [in Ukrainian]
9. Chimshit, S. I. (2008). Management of complex socio-economic systems potential: monograph [Upravlenie potentsialom slozhnykh sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh sistem: monohrafiya], DUAN, Monolit, Dnipropetrovsk, 362 s. [in Russian]
10. Global Economic Prospects: Managing Growth in a Volatile World (2012). The World Bank, Vol. 5, 162 s.