Structural analysis of market logistics as an information prerequisite for its regulation

Vladimir Lysyuk
Doctor of Economics, Рrofessor, Сhief Research Fellow, Institute of Market Problems and Economic & Ecological Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, e-mail: vlisyuk@ukr.net, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8766-4325

Victor Diordiev
Applicant for the Department of Market Mechanisms and Structures, Institute of Market Problems and Economic & Ecological Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, e-mail: vdiordiiev@gmail.com, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4466-4883

Cite this article:

Lysyuk, V., Diordiev, V. (2020). Structural analysis of market logistics as an information prerequisite for its regulation [Strukturnyi analiz lohistyky rynku yak informatsiina peredumova yoho rehuliuvannia], Socio-economic research bulletin, Vìsnik socìal’no-ekonomìčnih doslìdžen’ (ISSN 2313-4569), Odessa National Economic University, Odessa, No. 3-4 (74-75), pp. 161‒173.

Abstract

The article presents studies of the logistics structure of commodity market, based on the provisions of the general parametric theory of systems (GPTS). The logistics analysis of commodity movement on the market is presented and typical scheme of goods movement on a logistic chain is offered. Considering market logistics as an organizational system, the article presents its parametric model in the form of a matrix, the elements of which are logistic entities with their connections. It is proved, that the main basic element of the matrix structure of logistics system of commodity movement is a business entity that participates in the production and promotion of goods on the market. The types of business entities, which operating in the logistics system of the commodity market, are systematized. It is determined that business entities, which are distributed in logistics chains and their links, perform certain logistics functions due to their properties. It has been proved that business entities, which can be included as elements of the matrix market structure, should have the functions of performing logistics services. The content of these services is revealed and analyzed. The use of the corresponding target function in calculating the optimal logistics chains of commodity movement in the market is substantiated. The application of this approach, based on the multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) is shown. It is determined that the goal of the proposed target function, by which the value added chain is calculated, is its maximization in the supply chain. Calculations for the target function allow you to determine the optimal route of commodity movement in the market and the relevant logistics entities through which this route passes. Thus, it is proposed to organize (highlight) the most profitable logistics chains of the market, which will significantly reduce the logistics costs of commodity movement, as well as reduce the risks of logistics barriers.

Keywords

logistics; market logistics structure; structural analysis; elements of the logistics system; parameters; objective function; attributive concept; utility theory.

JEL classification: F630; L100; О100; P230; DOI: https://doi.org/10.33987/vsed.3-4(74-75).2020.161-173

UD classification: 005.932(045)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

1. Lysyuk, V. M. (2011). Reproductive function of commodity markets: monograph [Vosproizvodstvennaya funktsiya tovarnykh rynkov: monohrafiya] , IPREEI NANU, Odessa, 225 s. [in Russian]
2. Burkinskyi, B. V., Lysyuk, V. M. (eds.), Nikishina, O. V. et al. (2018). Commodity market logistics : monograph [Logystyka tovarnoho rynku: monohrafiia], IPREED NANU, Odessa, 243 s. [in Ukrainian]
3. Kalvant, S. P. (2002). Logistics and production activity: in the book «Information technology in business». Ed. by M. Zhelena. Trans. from Eng. A. Zheleznichenko, I. Klyuev and other [Logistika i proizvodstvennaya deyatelnost: v knige «Informatsionnye tekhnologii v biznese»; pod red. M. Zheleny; per. s angl. A. Zheleznichenko, I. Klyueva i dr.], Piter, Sankt-Peterburg, Moskva, Kharkov, Minsk, 1120 s. S. 927–954 [in Russian]
4. Beal, K. A. (ed.) (1990). Management guide to logisics engineering, Institute of Production Enegineering.
5. Uemov, A. I. (1978). System approach and general systems theory [Sistemnyy pokhod i obshchaya teoriya sistem], Mysl, Мoskva, 272 s. [in Russian]
6. Uemov, A. I., Saraev, I. N., Tsofnis, A. Yu. (2001). General systems theory for the humanities [Obshchaya teoriya sistem dlya gumanitariev], Widawnictwo «Universities Rediviva», Warszawa, 276 s. [in Russian]
7. Sadovskiy, V. N. (1974). Foundations of general systems theory. Logical and methodological analysis. Ed. by A. I. Uemov [Osnovaniya obshchei teorii sistem. Logiko-metodologicheskiy analiz; pod red. A. I. Uemova], Nauka, Мoskva, 279 s. S. 93–99 [in Russian]
8. Bertalanffy, L. (1969). The history and status of general systems theory, in the book «Systemic research. Methodological problems» [Istoriya i status obshchey teorii sistem], Ezhegodnik, Nauka, Мoskva, s. 20–37 [in Russian]
9. Stepanov, V. N. (2019). Riskology: foundations, applications, thesaurus: monograph [Riskologiya: osnovaniya, prilozheniya, tezaurus: monografiya], IPREEI NANU, Odessa, 292 s. [in Russian]
10. Lotfi, A. Zadeh (1974). Foundations of a new approach to the analysis of complex systemic decision-making processes. Trans. from Eng. [Osnovy novogo pokhoda k analizu slozhnykh sistemnykh protsessov prinyatiya resheniy; per. s angl.], Matematika segodniya, Znanie, Мoskva, 64 s. S. 5–48 [in Russian]
11. Optner, S. L. (1969). System analysis for solving business and industrial problems [Sistemnyy analiz dlya resheniya delovykh i promyshlennykh problem], Sovetskoe radio, Мoskva, 216 s. [in Russian]
12. Young, S. (1972). Systemic management of organization. Trans. from Eng. S. P. Nikanorov, S. A. Batasov [Sistemnoe upravlenie organizatsiey; per. s angl. S. P. Nikanorova, S. A. Batasova], Sovetskoe radio, Мoskva, 456 s.
13. Stepin, V. S. (2003). Self-developing systems and post-non-classical reality [Samorazvivayushchiesya sistemy i postneklassicheskaya realnost], Voprosy filosofii, No. 6, s. 5–17 [in Russian]
14. Vernadsky, V. I. (1988). The problem of time, space and symmetry. 1920-1942: Part 1, Section 2 «Space and time in inanimate and living nature». In the book: Philosophical thoughts of a naturalist [Problema vremeni, prostranstva i simmetrii. 1920-1942: Сh. 1, Razdel 2 «Prostranstvo і vremya v nezhyvoy i zhyvoy prirode». V knige: Filosofskie mysli naturalista], Nauka, Мoskva, 520 s. S. 210–296, 438–448 [in Russian]
15. Zhelena, M. (ed.). (2002). Information technology in business. Trans. from Eng. A. Zheleznichenko, I. Klyuev and other [Informatsionnye tekhnologii v biznese; per. s angl. A. Zheleznichenko, I. Klyueva i dr.], Piter, Sankt-Peterburg, Moskva, Kharkov, Minsk,1120 s. [in Russian]
16. Butenko, A. I., Shlafman, N. L., Umanets, T. V. et al. (2018). Formation of the technological entrepreneurship system in Ukraine: theoretical and methodological foundations: monograph [Formuvannia systemy tekhnolohichnoho pidpryiemnytsva v Ukraini: teoretyko-metodychni zasady: monohrafiia], IPREED NANU, Odessa, 128 s. [in Ukrainian]
17. Butenko, A. I., Shlafman, N. L., Umanets, T. V. et al. (2020). Theoretical foundations of innovative technologies market formation: monograph [Teoretychni zasady formuvannia rynku innovatsiinykh tekhnolohii: monohrafiia], IPREED NANU, Odessa, 130 s. [in Ukrainian]