Scientific approaches systematization to the classification of enterprises business models

Iryna Nyenno
PhD in Economics, Associated Professor, Department of Financial Management and Stock Market, Odessa National Economic University, E-mail:irinanenno@ua.fm

Cite this article:

Nyenno, I. (2016), Scientific approaches systematization to the classification of enterprises business models. Ed.: M. Zveryakov (ed.-in.ch.) and others [Systematyzatsiia naukovykh pidkhodiv dо klasyfikatsii bizness-modelei pidpryiemstv; za red. M. I. Zveryakova (gol. red. ta in.)], Socio-economic research bulletin; Vìsnik socìal’no-ekonomìčnih doslìdžen’ (ISSN 2113-4569), Odessa National Economic University, Odessa, No. 2 (61), pp. 89–100.

Abstract

The article considers the diversity of business models grouped according to certain criteria. The critical analysis is held and the essence and classification approaches to business models is revealed based on distribution: of the scale of investment and the degree of openness of the business model; according to the criteria such as the construction of value chain, market power innovators in comparison with owners of complementary assets and potential revenue generation; by the degree of market presence and the newness of the technology; by function; depending on the type of assets involved in the business and the rights to the assets to be sold; based profit model; sectoral approach. The results provide a basis for studying the formation of laws, development and transformation of the business models of enterprises. Systematization of the classification approaches to business models is suggested.

Keywords

business-model; values; value added cost; business-model classification; opened innovation; creation of demand.

JEL classification: L220; L240; L250;  DOI: https://doi.org/10.33987/vsed.2(61).2016.89-100

UD classification: 005.511:658(075.8)

References

1. Chesbro, G. (2007), Open Innovations. Creation of the profitable technologies [Otkrytye innovatsii. Sozdanie pribylnykh tekhnolohiy], Pokolenie, Moskva, 336 p.
2. Shweizer, L. (2007), Concept and evolution of the business models [Kontseptsiya i evolyutsiya modeley biznesa], Ekovest. Issledovatelskiy tsentr YPM, No. 6 (2), pp. 146–168.
3. Rothaermel, F. (2001), Incubement’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation, Strategic Management Journal, No. 22, pp. 687–699.
4. Zimin, K. (2013), Economics of the modern manufacturing and complementary assets [Ekonomika sovremennogo proizvodstva i komplimentarnye aktivy], Elektronnyy zhurnal «Upravlyaem predpriyatiem», No. 3 (26), pp. 1–7, available at: http://www.consulting1c.ru.
5. Green, H. (1999), Throw out your old business model, Business Week, No. 3621 (March), pp. 22–23.
6. Mahadevan, B. (2000), Business models for internet-based e-commerce. An anatomy, California Management Review, No. 42, pp. 55–69.
7. Debelak, D. (2009), Business-models: principles of creation the flourishing organization [Biznes-modeli: printsypy sozdaniya protsvetayushchey organizatsii], Izdatelskiy dom «Grebennikov», Moskva, 256 p.
8. Frolova, L. (2012), Formaion of the enterprise business-model [Formirovanie biznes-modeli predpriyatiya], Tsentr uchebnoy literatury, Kiev, 384 p.
9. Malone, T., Weill, P., Lai, R., D’Urso, V., Herman, G., Apel, T., Woerner, S., (2006), «Do Some Business Models Perform Better than Others?», MIT Sloan Working Paper 4615-06 May, 34 p.
10. Simanovskiy, F. (2010), Classification of the business models [Klassifikatsiya biznes-modeley], Lesnoy vestnik, No.1, pp. 180–185.