Evolution of national economic security paradigm for national security strategic ensuring

Anzhela Kulinskaya
PhD in Public Administration, Associate Professor, Department of Marketing and Management, Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade named after M. Tugan-Baranovsky, E-mail:angel-don82@mail.ru

Cite this article:

Kulinskaya, A. (2015), Evolution of national economic security paradigm for national security strategic ensuring. Ed.: M. Zveryakov (ed.-in-ch.) and others [Evoliutsiia paradyhmy natsionalnoi ekonomichnoi bezpeky v interesakh stratehichnoho zabezpechennia natsionalnoi bezpeky krainy; za red.: М. I. Zveriakova (gol. red.) ta in.], Socio-economic research bulletin (ISSN 2313-4569), Odessa National Economic University, Odessa, Issue 3, No. 58, рр. 72–78.

Abstract

The article discusses the development of national economic security in the interests of the national security strategic ensuring and forming of «national economic security» consensus definition. Methods of theoretical generalization and comparison, analysis and synthesis, dialectics were used in the process of the national economic security evolution investigation. On the basis of conducted research, it can be concluded that the national economic security is a complex and multifaceted public phenomenon, which is characterized by different essential features and forms of manifestation. A consensus definition of «national economic security» in the interests of the national security strategic ensuring was formed for the first time. Evaluation of definitions, given by Ukrainian researchers, and also the definitions, existing in regulatory legal acts, allows to define five approaches to understanding the concept of «national economic security».

Keywords

evolution; economic security; consensus definition; national security; approaches; development; stability.

JEL classification: A130, B250, B410, P160

UD classification: 043.86:33-027.542

References

1. Oleynikov, E. A. (2013), Economic and national security [Ekonomicheskaya i natsionalnaya bezopasnost], Examination, Moscow, 768 p. (rus)
2. Tambovtsev, V. N. (2014), «Financial crisis and economic theory» [Finansovyy krizis i ekonomicheskaya teoriya], Problems of Economics, No. 3, pp. 133–138 (rus)
3. Geiets, V. M., Kyzym, M. O., Chernyak, O. I. (2010), Modeling of economic security: state, region and enterprise [Modeliuvannia ekonomichnoi bezpeky: derzhava, rehion ta pidpryiemstvo], Inzhek, Kyiv, 240 p. (ukr)
4. Kozachenko, G. V., Lyashenko, A. M. (2013), Economic security of an enterprise: the nature and mechanism to ensure [Ekonomichna bezpeka pidpryiemstva: sut i mekhanizm zabezpechennia], Libra, Kyiv, 280 р. (ukr)
5. Muntiian, V. I. (2012), Economic security of the country [Ekonomichna bezpeka krainy], Kondor, Kyiv, 302 р. (ukr)
6. Shlemko, T. V., Binko, I. F. (2011), Economic security of Ukraine: the nature and directions of provision [Ekonomichna bezpeka Ukrainy: sutnist i napriamky zabezpechennia], NISD, Kyiv, 170 р. (ukr)
7. Gubskiy, B. V. (2012), The economic security of Ukraine: the methodology of measuring, condition or provision strategy [Ekonomichna bezpeka krainy: metodolohiia vymiru, stan ta stratehiia zabezpechennia], Lybid, Kyiv, 322 р. (ukr)
8. Yermoshenko, M. M. (2012), «The definition of threat to national interests in financial and credit sector» [Vyznachennia zahrozy natsionalnym interesam derzhavy u finansovo-kredytniy sferi], Economy of Ukraine, No. 1, pp. 24–32 (ukr)